security

 Security 

For different utilizations, see Security (disambiguation). 

Ladies' Army Corps (1941–1945) related public security with staying away from discussions about war work. 

Security is independence from, or flexibility against, expected mischief (or other undesirable coercive change) brought about by others. Recipients (in fact referents) of security might be of people and social gatherings, items and organizations, environments or some other element or wonder powerless against undesirable change. 

Exiles escaping war and uncertainty in Iraq and Syria show up at Lesbos Island, upheld by Spanish volunteers, 2015 

Security generally alludes to assurance from threatening powers, yet it has a wide scope of different faculties: for instance, as the nonattendance of damage (for example independence from need); as the presence of a fundamental decent (for example food security); as strength against possible harm or mischief (for example secure establishments); as mystery (for example a protected phone line); as control (for example a safe room or cell); and as a perspective (for example enthusiastic security). 

The term is likewise used to allude to acts and frameworks whose reason might be to give security (e.g.: security organizations, security powers, safety officer, digital protection frameworks, surveillance cameras, distant guarding). 

The word 'secure' entered the English language in the sixteenth century.[1] It is gotten from Latin securus, which means independence from tension: se (without) + cura (care, anxiety).[1] 

Outline 

Referent 

A security referent is the focal point of a security strategy or talk; for instance, a referent might be a likely recipient (or survivor) of a security strategy or framework. 

Security referents might be people or social gatherings, objects, foundations, biological systems, or some other wonder powerless against undesirable change by the powers of its environment.[2] The referent being referred to may consolidate numerous referents, similarly that, for instance, a country state is made out of numerous individual citizens.[3] 

Setting 

The security setting is the connections between a security referent and its environment.[2] From this point of view, security and weakness rely first upon whether the climate is useful or antagonistic to the referent, and furthermore how proficient is the referent of reacting to its/their current circumstance to endure and thrive.[3] 

Capacities 

The methods by which a referent accommodates security (or is accommodated) shift generally. They incorporate, for instance: 

Coercive abilities, including the ability to extend coercive force into the climate (for example plane carrying warship, handgun, guns); 

Defensive frameworks (for example lock, fence, divider, antivirus programming, air guard framework, protective layer) 

Cautioning frameworks (for example alert, radar) 

Political and social activity planned to keep frailty from creating (for example strife counteraction and change techniques); and 

Strategy planned to build up the enduring financial, physical, biological and different states of security (for example monetary change, biological assurance, reformist disarmament, militarization). 

Impacts 

Any activity proposed to give security may have various impacts. For instance, an activity may have wide advantage, upgrading security for a few or all security referents in the specific circumstance; on the other hand, the activity might be powerful just incidentally, or advantage one referent to the detriment of another, or be completely insufficient or counterproductive.